The Problem of China

羅素於1920-21年旅居中國一年，回英後寫了“The Problem of China”。


"The Chinese have discovered, and have practiced for many centuries, a way of life which, if it could be adopted by all the world, would make all the world happy. We Europeans have not. Our way of life demands strife, exploitation, restless change, discontent and destruction. Efficiency directed to destruction can only end in annihilation, and it is to this consummation that our civilization is tending, if it cannot learn some of that wisdom for which it despises the East."
羅素對中國文化的評價高得離奇，沒讀過的不易相信。


"Western Europe and America have a practically homogeneous mental life, which I should trace to three sources: 1) Greek culture; 2) Jewish religion and ethics; 3) modern industrialism, which itself is an outcome of modern science. We may take Plato, the Old Testament and Galileo as representing these three elements, which have remained singularly separable down to the present day. From the Greeks we derive literature and the arts, philosophy and pure mathematics; also the more urbane portions of our social outlook. From the Jews we derive fanatical belief, which its friends call "faith"; moral fervour, with the conception of sin; religious intolerance, and some part of or nationalism. From science, as applied in industrialism, we derive power and the sense of power, the belief that we are as gods, and may justly be the arbiters of life and death for unscientific races. We derive also the empirical method, by which almost all real knowledge has been acquired."


"Comparing the civilization of China with that of Europe, one finds in China most of what was to be found in Greece, but nothing of the other two elements of our civilization, namely Judaism and science. China is practically destitute of religion, not only in the upper classes, but throughout the population. There is a very definite ethical code, but it is not fierce or persecuting, and does not contain the notion of sin."


"The typical Westerner wishes to be the cause of as many changes as possible in his environment; the typical Chinaman wishes to enjoy as much and as delicately as possible. This difference is at the bottom of most of the contrast between China and the English-speaking world."
那是民國時期的中國，如今中西的差別已不多。


"Shortly before I left China, an eminent Chinese writer pressed me to say what I considered the chief defects of the Chinese. With some reluctance, I mentioned three: avarice, cowardice, and callousness. Strange to say, my interlocutor, instead of getting angry, admitted the justice of my criticism, and proceeded to discuss possible remedies."
誰說老外不理解中國國情？

兔年願望

閲讀的速度太慢，喝酒的速度太快，今年的願望是加快前者減慢後者，達至我的Pareto Optimality。

閲讀

少時沒有閲讀的習慣，畢業前所讀過的課外書恐怕只有金庸及古龍。離開校園找工作的那一年，才醒覺自己的諸多不足，然後讀了《李天命的思考藝術》，自此閲讀便與吃喝拉撒睡同級。


知識的探求是"moral obligation"，直至目前爲止，閲讀仍是唯一最有效途徑。後悔少時沒學好中英文，所以絕不容許女兒重蹈覆轍。


智商是先天，可改變的不多；小朋友天生好奇，不要窒礙便行；語文能力將會是教育的唯一重點。好奇心加高速閲讀，learning machine是也！

多元

“Diversity is essential to happiness, and in Utopia there is hardly any.” 烏托邦或共產主義的失敗，無需多講；“Diversity is essential to happiness”這一句，卻引起一些聯想。


原來渴望多元化是人類的本能：你已經有個很好的女朋友，還是想要第二個、第三個（如果有一個老婆，你想要的卻不是第二個老婆，而是一個女朋友，不過同樣是diversify）；你明明想生女，得女後卻想追個“仔”；到泰國渡假平靚正，你偏要試馬來西亞菲律賓；有一輛Benz，又想買Audi；有份高薪厚職，卻要冒險創業；好端端的做廠，卻去搞房地產...


根據邊際效用遞減定律，多元化很可能會帶來更高的Utility。但這只是“很可能”，並不是絕對。多一個女朋友，管理難度提高，所得的快樂未必抵得過所花費的心力；多一項業務，可能因爲分心而使整體回報下降。


有些人生而專一，不愛多樣化，如畢菲特。很可能是遺傳基因出錯，這些人卻能成就大事。有些天才，愛多樣化，也有巨大成就，如羅素，一定是基因出錯。凡人如我，想有點小成——美滿婚姻、幸福家庭加一番事業，每天要奮力抵擋Diversification的誘惑，在Diversity與Focus之間找平衡，真的會有點累。

實業

早上看到這則新聞，口中的鐵觀音噴了一半出來——《港燈擬易名電能實業》。捨一個百年老店的珍貴品牌，取一個面目模糊的三流公司名，到底是怎麽成事的呢？誰的建議？何人拍板？誰人附和？如果是普普通通的一家小公司，一個壞品味的老闆加兩個擦鞋仔夥計就容易理解...

按公告内的邏輯，GE應該正名為Assets Holdings Limited，簡稱ASSHOL，中文名就叫“實業”，正！

告白

《告白》是一齣三級電影，太沒道理。在我兒女十三四嵗的時候，就給他看。讓他知道人性的陰暗面，讓他知道世界上除了迪士尼，還有另一極端。太早發現，人太早熟，會變得cynical；太遲知道，性格已經形成，恐怕受不了。


日本是一個很奇特的國家，從村上春樹、東野圭吾到《告白》的湊佳苗，最受歡迎的小説都很陰暗，跟太平洋彼岸的天下第一大國很不一樣。


看電影的時候，聽到這首歌，差點叫了出來：
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9_uQzEsSA1A&feature=related
又是Radiohead。

論亂倫

已經過了半年，《西方哲學史》只讀了一半。讀至第二部分“Catholic Philosophy”，趣味驟減，讀來讀去讀不完，但
曾承諾自己一定要把書看完，絕不半途而廢。很有點自虐。


終於讀到有趣的。羅素論Saint Thomas：
"Against brother-sister incest there is a very curious argument: that if the love of husband and wife were combined with that of brother and sister, mutual attraction would be so strong as to cause unduly frequent intercourse."

Logic

甲：羅素論Gregory The Great，"...the most effective men of action are often intellectually second-rate"。

乙：So what？

甲：會不會是我太intellectual，以致缺乏行動，所以一無所成？

乙：(p -> q) & ~q 能推出 ~p，但 (p -> q) & ~p 並不能推出 ~q，你缺乏行動不代表你intellectually first-rate，你最大可能只是缺乏行動並且intellectually third-rate。

甲：...

兩首歌

最近發現兩首好歌，開心了兩星期：

“Once”《一奏傾情》上映時沒去看，最近才看影碟，原來是一齣音樂電影，所有歌都好聽，其中印象最深非“Lies”莫屬

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RwQP3tL6ba4

據維基所載，Once的製作費只十三萬歐元，票房則收兩千萬美元。會不會是史上投資回報率最高的電影？

看 “House” Season VI 第一集，House在精神病院被隔離時的背景音樂是Radiohead的“No Surprises”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qqsyXdj_p_I
如Coldplay的音樂，最適宜邊聼邊喝威士忌。

賣豬肉會發達？

表哥的工廠的一位技術員，打算辭職回鄉賣豬肉。他在工廠的月入約二千元人民幣，他哥哥的豬肉檔每天能賺數百元，就算加薪五成也無法阻止他回去“開分店”。


受“開分店”事件的影響，我忍不住要看看雨潤食品（1068）今天公佈的中期業績。年多前第一次讀它的年報時，沒有發現賣豬肉會發達，卻看見另一條發達之路 - 負商譽、配舊股。今天驚見第三條路（但唔係Tony Blair嗰條） - 政府補貼，半年四億六千萬港幣。那個地方政府如此之濶？究竟核數師是如何Audit政府補貼的？


By the way, 賣豬肉是不會發達的。